We published a series on the questions to ask an AI agency. The logical next step is to put ourselves through it, on the points that are not about method but about facts: who we are, since when, with whom, with what, and at what price.

Each point below has its own article, and each article says where to verify. We are not asking to be taken at our word.

The company

  • Who is behind it. The manager's name, the legal form, the registration number, the registered office. All public. The article.
  • The real size. How many we are, who does what, and what that size means for you. The article.
  • How long we have existed. Since when, and what has been built since. The article.

The work

  • Clients whose site you can open. Not logos: addresses. The article.
  • Measured output. What the platform has actually processed, in dated figures. The article.
  • An orchestrator's work. What it looks like across a week. The article.

The technology

  • The technologies we truly use. The list, without embellishment. The article.
  • What is ours and what comes from elsewhere. The question that decides what you are really buying. The article.
  • Inside the orchestrator. Components, data, permissions, errors. The article.

The money, and the rest

  • Prices and how we invoice. What is included, what is not. The article.
  • What to check before choosing us. Including where we are weaker than a large agency. The article.
  • What we do better than others. Three things, and one real reason. The article.
An agency that refuses to be checked is already telling you something.

One honest note about reviews

One piece is missing from this file, and we would rather say it here than let you discover it: we do not yet have client reviews published on an external platform. The unyx.studio/avis page lets our clients leave one, and they will be displayed as written once verified. Until then, judge us on what is verifiable today: the sites online, the legal identifiers, and the mechanisms we describe in these articles.